Sometimes it seems that language is something that just happens. Parents have watched in awe as their children
develop language. Every mother is
overcome with joy the first time their baby calls them “Mama”. Before long, the child has developed a
repertoire of words and they begin to experiment with ways to combine words in
an effort to have their needs met.
Missionaries visit a different country and before long, they are able to
speak fluently with the native population.
Many of us took a second language in high school and college. Some people have successfully learned a
language through these more formal courses that focus on the individual pieces
of language before putting the pieces together and creating fluent language.
Experts have studied how language is developed. The question is whether language is acquired
or learned. If we look at toddlers as
they learn to speak or missionaries who go to a different country without
knowing the language and eventually find they can speak the language fluently,
we might say that language is acquired.
No one taught them formally how to speak the language, but through total
immersion, they managed to develop the language. On the other hand, high school and college
courses have broken foreign languages down into manageable portions for us to
practice and learn. Many people have
learned to speak a foreign language this way. Of course, there are those who maintain that
once a person gets to a certain age, he can no longer learn a second language
at all regardless of the method.
Experts (specifically, Krashen) have determined that language can be
developed in one of two ways. Language
can be learned or acquired. The
traditional strategies used to help people develop a new language follow the
learning model. More recently, the
acquisition model has risen to favor. After
reading about the two models, I wonder if a combination of these strategies
would be more successful for the second language learner.
Learning
Model
|
Acquisition
Model
|
Language is taught through a series of exercises and drills on
portions of language (vocabulary, verbs, pronunciation).
|
Language is subconscious and taught through immersion. The second language learner learns the
language by using it.
|
Language learned through the Learning Model is learned in a classroom
and can be tested.
|
Learning Language through the Acquisition Model does not necessarily
need to happen in school and cannot be tested.
|
Language learned through the Learning Model may be quickly forgotten
if not used immediately and regularly.
|
Second Language Learners using the Acquisition Model not only learn
specific vocabulary, but how to speak the language accurately.
|
Specific errors can be corrected so second language learners
understand how the language components fit together.
|
Errors will occur, but the focus is on maintaining meaning and being
understood.
|
Although there are people who are
able to learn a second language through the Learning Model, I have not been
successful with those strategies. I believe
I would more effectively learn a second language through the Acquisition
Model. In circumstances where I have
needed to use second language skills regularly, I was more successful in
learning and retaining the second language.
I have also learned that if you don’t use it, you lose it. It has been several years since I used my
second language skills and I’m not sure I would be terribly effective
anymore. That being said, it appears
that the jury is still out on the exact formula for successful second language
acquisition. Some research has suggests
that children who are learning English are more successful when they learn
their first language alongside English as their second language. However, it appears that complete immersion
in an exclusively English only environment may not be as successful as some have
suggested. “Studies have shown that when
students have full native language proficiency, including the ability to do
academic reading and writing, they can transfer this knowledge from their first
language to the second.” (Freeman &
Freeman, 2004).
As is so often the case, balance
appears to be the solution. Students engaged in a balanced bilingual program that
offers both immersion and more formal classroom opportunities are likely to be more successful than those in
programs that offer English immersion or formal study exclusively.
The Students:
L: Look up words in the dictionary to write definitions
A: Make a Venn Diagram to compare two stories
L: Practice Sounding Out words
L: Read in Round Robin Fashion
A: Correct Peers when they make a mistake during reading
L: Identify words on a big book page that start with the same sound.
The Students:
L: Look up words in the dictionary to write definitions
A: Make a Venn Diagram to compare two stories
L: Practice Sounding Out words
L: Read in Round Robin Fashion
A: Correct Peers when they make a mistake during reading
L: Identify words on a big book page that start with the same sound.
L: Group cards with classmates' names by a criterion on such as first or last letter
A: Write rhyming poetry and then discuss different spellings for the same sound
A: Ask the teacher how to spell any word they don't know
A: Read a language experience story they have created with the teacher
A: Work in pairs to arrange words from a familiar chant into sentences
L: Divide words into syllables
L: On a worksheet, draw a line from each word to the picture that starts with the same sound
A: Make alphabet books on different topics
The Teacher:
L: Preteaches vocabulary
A: Does a shared reading with a big book
A: Makes sure that students read only books that fit their level
L: Has students segment words into phonemes
A: Writes words the students dictate for a story and has the students help with the spelling of difficult words
L: Asks students to look around the room and find words starting with a certain letter
A: Uses decodable texts
L/A: Sets aside time for SSR (Silent Sustained Reading) each day
L: Teaches Latin and Greek roots
A: Has students meet in literature circles
L: Conducts phonics drills
A: Chooses predictable texts
A: Teaches students different comprehension strategies
A: Does a picture walk of a new book
L: Uses a variety of worksheets to teach different skills
A: Write rhyming poetry and then discuss different spellings for the same sound
A: Ask the teacher how to spell any word they don't know
A: Read a language experience story they have created with the teacher
A: Work in pairs to arrange words from a familiar chant into sentences
L: Divide words into syllables
L: On a worksheet, draw a line from each word to the picture that starts with the same sound
A: Make alphabet books on different topics
The Teacher:
L: Preteaches vocabulary
A: Does a shared reading with a big book
A: Makes sure that students read only books that fit their level
L: Has students segment words into phonemes
A: Writes words the students dictate for a story and has the students help with the spelling of difficult words
L: Asks students to look around the room and find words starting with a certain letter
A: Uses decodable texts
L/A: Sets aside time for SSR (Silent Sustained Reading) each day
L: Teaches Latin and Greek roots
A: Has students meet in literature circles
L: Conducts phonics drills
A: Chooses predictable texts
A: Teaches students different comprehension strategies
A: Does a picture walk of a new book
L: Uses a variety of worksheets to teach different skills
Reference
Freeman, D. & Freeman, Y.
(2004). Essential Linguistics: What You Need to Know to Teach
Reading, ESL, Spelling, Phonics,
Grammar. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hi Sara,
ReplyDeleteI agree that there needs to be balanced literacy instruction in order for ELL’s to be successful. I work in a district where 90% of the students are Spanish speaking. I see the defeat in their eyes when they are in structured learning view classrooms where they don’t know what is going on and it isn’t engaging.
A huge benefit to acquisition view according to Freeman (2004) is, “Teachers help students say what students want to say and also give them strategies so they can continue to communicate when they don’t have the linguistic resources yet.” I believe that there needs to be a little bit of learning view, but acquisition view just seems to make sense. If we went to a different country, we would learn by some direction instruction along with acquiring the language through experiences. You made a strong case about why acquisition view is effective for ELL’s!
Tracy
Freeman, D. & Freeman, Y. (2004). Essential Linguistics: What You Need to Know to Teach
Hi Tracy,
DeleteI think I would have been able to learn and maintain a second language if I had been in a position where I had to use it regularly (acquisition). I learned the lessons, but since I never used the skills, I lost them. That is why I think a balance of explicit teaching (teaching mode) and putting skills to work (acquisition) is important.
Jenny
Great analysis of the two approaches. I wonder if you have seen research that shows someone who learns a language through acquisition will retain that knowledge longer than someone who was taught with a learning approach. Presuming both students left the area that required use of the second language, I wonder if retention rates would vary much. I was also interested in your remark about certain beliefs "that once a person gets to a certain age, he can no longer learn a second language at all regardless of the method." Age does seem to make a difference in how easily a language can be acquired or learned. We all acquire our first language, and children raised with two languages seem able to acquire both without complications. I wonder what the brain research on this phenomenon says. What age do we lose our natural ability to acquire a language unconsciously?
ReplyDeleteHi Mallory,
DeleteThe Freeman text says that, "...researchers have hypothesized that people are no longer able to acquire some aspects of language, such as the phonology, once the brain is lateralized and language is located in the left hemisphere." They suggest that the best period for acquisition of phonology is before the brain lateralizes, which generally happens around puberty. That being the case, it would be more difficult for an adult to learn a second language than a child.
Jenny
Interesting analogy as well as comments here. Some of your statements about second language acquisition could have been written by me. I too acquired a second language at a later stage (high school, and college) that I have not maintained and struggle to communicate with today.
ReplyDeleteI found the acquisition methods such as my Spanish communication classes helped the most when it came to acquiring the language in college. My experience with second language acquisition reinforces your above statement that "the best period for acquisition of phonology is before the brain lateralizes around puberty." It is definitely possible for adults to acquire a second language but proves to be more difficult both to learn and maintain after puberty.
Brooke Dannar